This is a sample report with fictional data — your assessment will reflect your property
MOAT Risk
Sample Assessment

Example Self-Storage Facility

Sample City, AR  ·  Self-Storage  ·  6.2 acres, 4 buildings, 412 units
Assessment ID ML-SAMPLE-000001
Overall Risk Score
66/100
Moderate Risk

Scored across seven industry-standard domains. Higher is safer — this property has solid fundamentals with specific, fixable gaps.

Domain Risk Profile

Each spoke reflects one scoring standard. Shorter reach toward center = higher exposure in that domain.

ASIS CPTED ANSI IESNA NFPA IFC OSHA
ASIS (physical security) 62
CPTED (design & layout) 48
ANSI (facility standards) 71
IESNA (lighting) 55
NFPA (fire/life safety) 82
IFC (fire code) 76
OSHA (workplace safety) 68
Photo Evidence

Annotated findings from the site walk

Each assessment includes marked-up photos from your property, tying every finding to exactly where it was observed. Illustrated below for the sample property.

Finding 1High

Main gate — manual override

Both panels found propped open outside scheduled hours, bypassing the keypad entirely.

Finding 2High

Gap between Buildings 3 & 4

Illumination drops below 0.5 fc in this corridor — well under the IESNA-recommended level.

BLIND SPOT
Finding 3Medium

North perimeter fence line

Existing camera's field of view ends ~40 ft short of the fence corner.

Prioritized Findings

Where to focus first

Ranked by risk reduction per dollar — the fixes at the top address the largest exposure with the least effort.

1
HighAccess Control

Perimeter gate left in manual-override mode overnight

Staff have been propping the gate open after hours for delivery convenience, removing the primary access barrier. Recommendation: reprogram the gate controller to enforce scheduled auto-locking, and audit override logs weekly.

2
HighLighting / CPTED

Illumination gap between Buildings 3 and 4 creates a concealment zone

Measured light levels fall below 0.5 footcandles in this corridor, well under the IESNA-recommended threshold for storage aisles. Recommendation: add two pole lights to bring average illumination to 1.0 fc or higher.

3
MediumCamera Coverage

~40 ft blind spot along the north perimeter fence line

Current camera placement leaves the northeast corner unmonitored, the most common entry point for perimeter breaches in similar facilities. Recommendation: reposition the existing PTZ camera or add one fixed camera to close the gap.

4
MediumParking / Perimeter

Visitor parking area unmonitored after office hours

The lot sits outside current camera range and office-hour staff oversight. Recommendation: extend camera coverage to the visitor lot and add signage to support natural surveillance per CPTED principles.

5
LowSignage / Liability

Missing security-camera and no-trespassing signage at two entrances

Posted signage strengthens deterrence and supports your liability position if an incident occurs. Recommendation: install signage at the north and east entrances.

Get your property's own scored assessment

This sample shows the format — your report will reflect your actual lighting, cameras, access control, and layout, with findings prioritized the same way.

All property details, scores, and findings on this page are illustrative and do not represent a real assessed property.
MOAT Risk · Property Security Risk Assessments